Articles included in meta-analysis

  1. Angle, H. V., Johnsen, T., Grebenkemper, N. S., & Ellinwood, E. H. (1979, Feb). Computer interview support for clinicians. Professional Psychology, 49-57.
  2. Biskin, B. H., & Kolotkin, R. L. (1977). Effects of computerized administration on scores on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 543-549.
  3. Booth-Kewely, S., Edwards, J. E., & Rosenfeld, P. (1992). Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 562-566.
  4. Carr A. C. & Ghosh, A. (1983). Accuracy of behavior assessment by computer. British Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 66-70.
  5. Carr, A. C., Ghosh, A., & Ancill (1983). Can a computer take a psychiatric history? Psychological Medicine, 13, 151-158.
  6. Davis, C., & Cowles, M. (1989). Automated psychological testing: Method of administration, need for approval, and measures of anxiety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 311-320.
  7. Erdman, H., Klein, M. H., & Greist, J. H. (1983). The reliability of a computer interview for drug use/abuse information. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 15 , 66-68. Evan, W. M., & Miller III, J. R. (1969). Differential effects on response bias of computer vs. conventional administration of a social science questionnaire: An exploratory methodological experiment. Behavioral Science, 14, 216-227.
  8. Finegan, J. E., and Allen, N. J. (1994). Computerized and written questionnares: Are they equivalent? Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 483-496.
  9. Greist, J. H., Gustafson, D. H., Stauss, F F., Rowse, G. L., Laughren, T. P & Chiles, J. A. (1973). Computer interview for suicide-risk prediction. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 1327-1332. Greist, J. H., Klein, M. H., Erdman, H. P., Bires, J. K., Bass, S. M., Machtinger, P. E., & Kresge, D. G. (1987). Comparison of computer- and interviewer-administered versions of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 38, 1304-1311.
  10. Hart, R. R. & Goldstein, M. A. (1985). Computer-assisted psychological assessment. Computers in Human Services, 1, 69-75.
  11. Kantor, J. (1991). The effects of computer administration and identification on the Job Descriptive Index (JDI). Journal of Business and Psychology, 5, 309-323.
  12. Karabenick, S. A., & Knapp, J. R. (1988). Effects of computer privacy on help-seeking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 461-472.
  13. Katz, L., & Dalby, J. T. (1981a). Computer and manual administration of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 586-592.
  14. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. S. (1986). Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 402-413.
  15. Koson, D., Kitchen, M., Kochen, M, & Stodolsky, D. (1970). Psychological testing by computer: Effect on response bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 803-810.
  16. Lankford, J. S., Bell, R. W., & Elias, J. W. (1994). Computerized versus standard personality measures: Equivalency, computer anxiety, and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior, 10, 497-510.
  17. Lautenschlager, G. J., & Flaherty, V. L. (1990). Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 310-314.
  18. Levine, S., Ancill, R. J., & Roberts, A. P. (1989). Assessment of suicide risk by computer-delivered self- rating questionnaire: Preliminary findings. Acta-Psychiatrica-Scandinavica, 80, 216-220.
  19. Locke, S. E., Kowaloff, H. B., Hoff, R. G., Safran, C., Popovsky, M. A., Cotton, D. J., Finkelstein, D. M., Page, P. L., & Slack, W. V. (1992). Computer-based interview for screening blood donors for risk of HIV infection. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, 1301-1305.
  20. Lucas, R.W,, Mullin, P. J., Luna, C.B.X., & McInroy, D.C. (1977). Psychiatrists and a computer as interrogators of patients with alcohol-related illnesses: A comparison. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 160-167.
  21. Lukin, M. E., Dowd, E. T., Plake, B. S., & Kraft, R. G. (1985). Comparing computerized versus traditional psychological assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 49-58.
  22. Lushene, R. E., O'Neil Jr., H. F., & Dunn, T. (1974). Equivalent validity of a completely computerized MMPI. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 353-361.
  23. Martin, C. L., & Nagao, D. H. (1989). Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 72-80.
  24. Millstein, S. G. (1987). Acceptability and reliability of sensitive information collected via computer interview. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 523-533.
  25. Ridgway, J., MacCulloch, M. J., & Mills, H. E. (1982). Some experiences in administeringt a psychometric test with a light pen and microcomputer. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 17, 265-278.
  26. Robinson, R., & West, R. (1992). A comparison of computer and questionnaire methods of history-taking in a genito-urinary clinic. Psychology and Health, 6, 77-84. Rosenfeld, P., Doherty, L. M., Vicino, S. M., Kantor, J., & Greaves, J. (1989). Attitude assessment in organizations: Testing three microcomputer-based survey systems. The Journal of General Psychology, 116, 145-154.
  27. Rosenfeld, P., Giacalone, R. A., Knouse, S. B., Doherty, L. M., Vicino, S. M.,Kantor, J., & Greaves, J. (1991). Impression management, candor, and microcomputer-based organizational surveys: An individual differences approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 23-32.
  28. Rozensky, R. H., Honor, L. F., Rasinski, K., Tovian, S. M., & Herz, G. I. (1986). Paper-and-pencil versus computer-administered MMPIs: A comparison of patients' attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 111-116.
  29. Schuldberg, D. (1988). The MMPI is less sensitive to the automated testing format than it is to repeated testing: Item and scale effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 4, 285-298.
  30. Skinner, H. A., & Allen, B. A. (1983). Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51 (2), 267-275.
  31. Synodinos, N. E., Papacostas, C. S., & Okimoto, G. M. (1994). Computer admnistered versus paper-and- pencil surveys and the effect of sample selection. Behavior Research Methods, 26, 395-401.
  32. Waterton, J. J., & Duffy, J. C. (1984). A comparison of computer interviewing techniques and traditional methods in the collection of self-report alcohol consumption data in a field survey. International Statistical Review, 52, 173-182.
  33. Wilson, F. R., Genco, K. T., & Yager, G. G. (1985). Assessing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil vs. computerized tests: Demonstration of a promising methodology. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 265-275.