This is one of the mockups used in the design of the ontology editor. In this mockup scenario the user decides to edit the facet value "Institution" of the Slot-Value-Type facet of the Thesis.University slot. Notice that although there are links on almost everything on the page, the only one that actually works is the submit button in the form that takes the designer to the next scene in the mockup storyline. In this case, it will be the edit-in-place form for changing this facet value. ....
[Up] [Next]
Class Thesis in theory Bibliographic-Data

Class THESIS


Slots on Class:

*Documentation:
An official report on a bout of graduate work for which one receives a degree, published by the university. Never mind that some fields make a big deal about the difference between dissertations and theses. From the bibliographic perspective, they are both of the same family.
Subclass-Of: Document
Exhaustive-Subclass-Partition: {Masters-thesis, Doctoral-thesis}

*Slots on Instances:

Doc.Author:
Slot-Cardinality: 1
Doc.Publication-Date:
Slot-Cardinality: 1
Doc.Title:
Slot-Cardinality: 1
*Thesis.University:
Slot-Cardinality: 1
*Slot-Value-Type: Institution

Notes:

Defined in theory: Bibliographic-data
Source code: bibliography.lisp
*What about theses published as technical reports?
If it is cited as a TR, it is a TR. One can imagine adding a cross-reference field to references that points to associated documents or other references.
What about theses published as technical reports?
If it is cited as a TR, it is a TR. One can imagine adding a cross-reference field to references that points to associated documents or other references.