CHI 96 REVIEWER VOLUNTEER FORM INTRODUCTION CHI 96 invites experienced members of the CHI community to submit their names to a reviewer database that will be used by the chairs of a number of participation categories to select their reviewers. Applications for reviewing Short Papers/Interactive Posters and Social Action Interactive Posters for CHI 96 will be accepted until November 1, 1995. **The application date for Long Papers has passed.** You can still volunteer to be a long paper reviewer with this form, if you wish: your application will be added to the reviewer database for CHI *97*. Please email this completed form to the Papers Co-chairs (chi96-papers@parc.xerox.com). There are 5 sections to this form: 1. Contact Information (required) 2. Participation Categories (required) 3. Paper Submission Types (only required if paper reviewing is chosen) 4. Matching Phrases (required) 5. Reviewing Background (optional) Be sure to complete all of the required sections. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTACT INFORMATION Name: Affiliation: Postal Address: Express Delivery Address: (must include street and telephone number) Country: Daytime telephone: Home telephone: Fax: E-mail address: PARTICIPATION CATEGORIES Please indicate [x] all categories that you are willing and able to review: [] Paper Reviewer About 10 reviews from September 15 to October 11. If you select this category, be sure to indicate the Paper Submission Types you feel qualified to review. [] Short Paper and Interactive Poster Reviewer 10 to 15 reviews between December 15 and January 12. [] Social Action Interactive Poster Reviewer Starting December 15. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAPER SUBMISSION TYPES Fill out this section only if you selected "Papers Reviewer" as a possible Participation Category above. Select [x] the types of paper submissions that you would be a good reviewer for. The descriptions are from the Papers section of the CHI 96 Call for Participation. [] Empirical Papers Empirical Papers describe the collection and interpretation of data concerning the design or use of an HCI artifact. Data might include interviews, observations, surveys, or experimental manipulations. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches to data collection and analysis are welcome. Quantitative analyses should include appropriate statistical tests. Review criteria include the appropriateness and rationale for the methods of data collection and analysis, and the significance of the conclusions for practice or research in HCI. [] Theory Papers Theory Papers describe principles, concepts, or models on which work in HCI (empirical, systems, experience, methodology) might be based; authors of theoretical papers are expected to position their ideas within a broad context of HCI frameworks and theories. Review criteria include the originality and soundness of the analysis provided, as well as the relevance of the theoretical content to HCI practice and/or research. [] Experience Papers Experience Papers describe the application of HCI methods, theory or tools to the design or development of an HCI artifact. Review criteria include the value of the reflections abstracted from the experience and their relevance to other designers or to researchers working on related methods, theory or tools. [] Methodolgy Papers Methodology Papers describe a novel method for the design or evaluation of an HCI artifact; the method may be intended for use in research or development settings (or both), but the paper should be clear about the intended audience. Review criteria include the originality and soundness of the method and its usefulness for the intended audience. [] Systems Papers Systems Papers describe the software and technology associated with a novel interactive application, user interface feature, user interface design or development tool. Review criteria include the originality and relevance to other user interface developers of the system's architecture and behavior. Authors should be clear to what extent the system has been implemented. Authors are encouraged to develop a coordinated demonstration or video submission of the system for CHI 96. [] Opinion Papers Opinion Papers present the author's well-supported opinion about some aspect of HCI. Review criteria include the impact and quality of the argumentation, including the experience (research or practice) used to support the opinion. Authors of opinion papers are urged to contact one of the Papers Co-Chairs in advance of submitting a paper, to get feedback on their idea, since CHI rarely accepts opinion papers. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MATCHING PHRASES The following list contains 72 matching phrases that will be used by papers, demonstrations, short papers, and interactive posters chairs in order to select reviewers. Please rate each of these phrases on the following 6-point scale: [0]- No reviewing You do not want to review any submissions in this area. [1]- Outsider's impression This is not your area, but you are willing to give an outsider's impression. [2]- Passing knowledge You have a passing knowledge of this area. [3]- Knowledgable You are knowlegable in this area. [4]- Expert You are an expert in this area. [5]- Expert and motivated You are an expert in this area and you really want to review submissions in this area. [] Agents [] Analysis methods [] Applications [] Auditory I/O [] CSCW [] Cognitive models [] Collaborative work [] Cost/benefit analysis [] Database access [] Design rationale [] Design techniques [] Development tools [] Dialog analysis [] Disability access [] Documentation or training [] Educational applications [] Empirical studies [] End-user programming [] Entertainment [] Ethnography [] Evaluation [] Expert systems [] Formal methods [] Global interfaces [] Graphic design [] GOMS [] Group work [] HCI education [] HCI in organizations [] HCI professional issues [] Home [] Hypermedia [] Individual differences [] Information retrieval [] Input devices [] Intelligent systems [] Interaction technology [] Interaction design [] Internet [] Legal issues [] Metaphors [] Mobile computing [] Multimedia [] Networks or communication [] Office [] Participatory design [] Pen-based input [] Predictive interface [] Programming environments [] Prototyping [] Psychology of programming [] Social impacts [] Software engineering [] Standards [] Tactile or gestural I/O [] Task analysis [] Technology transfer [] Theory [] 3-D interfaces [] Toolkits [] UIMS [] Usability engineering [] Usability testing [] UI design environments [] User models [] User studies [] Video [] Video analysis [] Virtual reality [] Visual design [] Visualization [] Work analysis In addition to this list, please include any other phrases that will match the abstracts of the submissions you would like to review: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- REVIEWING BACKGROUND This section is not required. Previous CHI Publications: Other Relevant Publications: Previous CHI Reviewing: (indicate year and participation category) Other Relevant Reviewing: Other Relevant Experience: --------- END OF FORM -----------------------